<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shanghai &#8211; The Destruction Side of Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinarhyming.com/2010/07/19/shanghai-the-destruction-side-of-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinarhyming.com/2010/07/19/shanghai-the-destruction-side-of-things/</link>
	<description>A gallimaufry of random China history and research interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul French</title>
		<link>http://www.chinarhyming.com/2010/07/19/shanghai-the-destruction-side-of-things/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinarhyming.com/?p=3791#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Certainly a percentage have been allowed to become slums to hasten their demise and allow the government and property developers in. At present that is still occurring in areas the government doesn&#039;t see a sale opportunity on them such as parts of Hongkou and Yangpu. Elsewhere, where the government sees money in gentrification or political issue in refurbishment and protection they remain. Surely the places people live are as worthy of saving and restoring as banks and theatres or  a rather one-sided view of the past will emerge. We heard the same arguements as this in Peking and elsewhere about &#039;slums&#039; where the government saw no profit to be derived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly a percentage have been allowed to become slums to hasten their demise and allow the government and property developers in. At present that is still occurring in areas the government doesn&#8217;t see a sale opportunity on them such as parts of Hongkou and Yangpu. Elsewhere, where the government sees money in gentrification or political issue in refurbishment and protection they remain. Surely the places people live are as worthy of saving and restoring as banks and theatres or  a rather one-sided view of the past will emerge. We heard the same arguements as this in Peking and elsewhere about &#8216;slums&#8217; where the government saw no profit to be derived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottLoar</title>
		<link>http://www.chinarhyming.com/2010/07/19/shanghai-the-destruction-side-of-things/comment-page-1/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottLoar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinarhyming.com/?p=3791#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>These photos of overcrowded hovels long past needing tear-down do nothing to advance understanding of true architectural gems and historic districts bulldozed flat in Shanghai. I rarely agree with the high-rises that replace them but in any other country these would be properly called &quot;slums&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These photos of overcrowded hovels long past needing tear-down do nothing to advance understanding of true architectural gems and historic districts bulldozed flat in Shanghai. I rarely agree with the high-rises that replace them but in any other country these would be properly called &#8220;slums&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

